New Car Test Drive World's Leading Provider of Automotive Reviews
Home Car Reviews Pricing Comparisons Awards & Advice Finance & Insurance About Us


New and Used Car Reviews
Search Site

Car Reviews   |   Sneak Previews   |   Most Researched   |   Kia Sportage Prices in Your Area
Review Pages
----------------------------------------
1. Overview
2. Walkaround and Interior
3. Driving Impressions
4. Summary, Prices, Specs

    Compare Vehicles
    Email to a Friend
    Print version

    Get a New Car Price Quote
    Search Used Vehicle Inventory




2013 Kia Sportage (continued)

Driving Impressions

2013 Kia Sportage

We found the Kia Sportage enjoyable to drive, and the all-wheel-drive models more than the front-wheel-drive models, but neither is boring or outside of its element in the overwhelming majority of circumstances and situations.

Kia has done a commendable job of milking maximum power out of the 2.4-liter four-banger, while delivering decent fuel economy. Measured again against the Subaru Forester, Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4, the Kia Sportage 2.4-liter delivers horsepower and torque numbers that are just about dead-on average for the group.

Only a few years ago this class offered a few V6 options, but those have disappeared with rising gas prices and tighter fuel economy regulations. Now the only optional engines in this group are the turbo-fours offered by Subaru and Kia. The Kia 2.0-liter turbo is the far stronger of the two, with 260 hp for the Sportage vs. 224 hp for the Forester, and 269 pound-feet of torque for the Kia vs. 226 for the Subaru.

Kia's 6-speed automatic handles gear changes reasonably smoothly, including downshifts when necessary for passing and merging, whether in regular auto or Sportmatic mode. We have not tested the manual gearbox.

The brakes in the Sportage did their job with confidence and no noticeable fade after several miles of reasonably rapid motoring on twisting two-lane roads winding through the Santa Cruz Mountains south of San Francisco.

Response to steering inputs was decent on our Sportage EX wearing the low profile tires and 18-inch wheels, with understeer more easily induced with front-wheel drive than with all-wheel drive. The same held for steering effort, with the AWD feeding back a heavier, more solid feel. Given the relatively high center of gravity, body roll (lean) in tight corners was modest. Directional stability, the tendency for the car to hold its line on straight stretches and through corners, raised no concerns, requiring corrections only in response to pavement irregularities. Suspension damping was decent over bumpy pavement, the worst of which produced something more like head nodding than head bobbing.

For mud or snow, the AWD system offers a Lock Mode that puts equal amounts of torque to each wheel at up to a maximum of 25 mph.

The test models we drove were early production models, i.e., not quite ready for prime time, so the minor squeaks and rattles emanating from somewhere in the neighborhood of the dash are likely not indicative of what will be in dealers showrooms. The tire noise from the stock Hankook tires, though, could be, which would be too bad, as otherwise, the ride and road holding were quite respectable.

Comparing overall handling, the Subaru Forester feels about the same in terms of road holding and overall stability (very good, in other words), with its lower center of gravity making up for a track (distance between the wheels side to side) that's more than three inches narrower. The CR-V and RAV4 don't fare as well, tipping the scales on average 100-200 pounds heavier than the Sportage (depending on equipment), and riding on a track that's narrower than the Sportage's by about two inches, the net effect of which is to allow more body roll in turns and to generate head gyrations that are closer to bobbing than to nodding over rough pavement. Basic ride quality is comparable for the cars in this class.


< Previous   1   2   4   Next page >